RSS

Just want to be heard…

09 Sep

One of the things call centers supervisors really like to do is listen in on agent calls.  I’m sure it’s not *just* because they are nosy-type people, [insert business justification here], so part of my job is to make sure their eavesdropping is configured and working properly in Cisco Contact Center Express (UCCX).

Now there are about 11 ways to Sunday monitoring and recording can be jacked up by various elements, not the least of these being the voice engineer at the configuration helm. So when, during a deployment, it was found that calls were not able to be monitored or recorded, I skipped right past the look of surprise and moved straight into the what-is-it-this-time expression.

First, the symptoms.  Agents were getting calls and their supervisors were recording these calls. This means a whole bunch of agent/supervisor/phone setup tasks were completed correctly. Plus one point to the competent voice engineer with the mad skills. The recorded files were then being played back, however, and the tracks contained no audio.  Minus one point to the slightly less competent voice engineer who may, in fact, just be mad.

This not being my first rodeo, I initially suspect a codec issue, quickly confirmed by using the question mark button on the phones when the calls are made.  The display on the phone shows me the codec the calls are using is g.722 which, while a lovely codec, is not actually supported by UCCX.  It having been a long day, I decide to take a hatchet to g.722 and disable it in the Call Manager system wide parameters – ensuring no more g.722 EVER. Or at least not in this cluster.

Fully expecting the new rounds of tests to be successful, I get to use my surprised look after all when, once again, the recorded tracks lack audio. Grrr.

Firing up trusty Wireshark shows something very interesting – there is no RTP traffic from the PC to the UCCX server. For those who don’t eat, sleep, breath voice, RTP is the transport for the audio portion of the call.  All the setup/control messages will generally use SCCP, SIP, or H323, but the packetized voice uses RTP over UDP. The fact that it is completely absent from my capture file is more than a bit disconcerting.

After a nice talk with my buddies at TAC, they inform me that this is commonly seen with the particular brand of antivirus being run on the client workstations. After uninstalling the antivirus product and running the capture file again, RTP packets make an appearance and victory is declared in my favor.  100 points to the cheeky voice engineer from Dallas.

In case you were wondering what this RTP traffic looks like in Wireshark, you are looking for something like this:

RTP Traffic

As an added bonus for making it to the end of this post, here are a few other things you should check on the phone device configuration page in Call Manager when having issues with recording and monitoring, they are pulled from this document: Cisco CAD Troubleshooting Guide CAD 8.0 for Cisco Unified Contact Center Express Release 8.0 Cisco Unified Communications Manager Edition revised April 2011

  • PC Port—Enabled. If the PC Port is not enabled, the agent PC that is connected to the port will not have network access. No voice streams will be seen by the desktop monitor module
  • PC Voice VLAN Access—Enabled. If the PC Voice VLAN Access is not enabled, no voice streams will be seen by the desktop if the desktop is not a member of the same VLAN as the phone.
  • Span to PC Port—Enabled. If the Span to PC Port is not enabled, the voice streams seen by the phone will not be seen by the desktop monitor module.

Advertisements
 
12 Comments

Posted by on 2011/09/09 in UCCX

 

Tags: , , ,

12 responses to “Just want to be heard…

  1. daveengineer

    2011/09/11 at 14:47

    endpoint monitoring is great.. removes the span port issues.. sadly you replace those with antivirus, windows firewall and corporate helpdesk support issues.. just try to load calabrio aqm with screen capture on 500 machines.. ugh.

     
    • amyengineer

      2011/09/12 at 10:12

      Ugh! I’ve had to uninstall and reinstall AQM on 120 machines, *that* was a nightmare – can’t imagine 500…

       
  2. pilotmike

    2011/09/11 at 20:21

    Nice post Amy! Albeit not totally related, but your G.722 comment reminded me of a setting we use in our CUCM cluster. We use silent monitoring and automatic call recording in our environment. Our admin users love G.722, however, we don’t use it on our contact center for some of the same reasons you provided (basically it causes problems in that crazy temperamental cog we call the contact center).

    One handy service parameter we use in our CUCM cluster to help us control its use is the Service Parameter to set G.722: “Enabled for All Devices Except Recording-Enabled Devices.” Our admin users get G722 (unless they are recorded). If you are recorded, “…no [G722] soup fo’ you!” 🙂

     
    • amyengineer

      2011/09/12 at 10:14

      Hey, thanks for the tip! I knew there was a way to disable it less thoroughly, but I didn’t actually look to see what that method was. I’ll be putting that information away for future use! 🙂

       
  3. daveengineer

    2011/11/01 at 10:56

    What was the name of the antivirus software??

     
    • amyengineer

      2011/11/01 at 12:51

      Microtrend in this case- don’t remember exact version number…

       
      • daveengineer

        2011/11/01 at 14:21

        figures.. thats what i have with a customer in denton.. crap.

         
      • amyengineer

        2011/11/01 at 14:27

        This customer was running the extra desktop protection feature, we tried turning just that part off and it worked. I can’t remember what Trend was calling that piece, but you may check on that – in the alternative, completely removing the antivirus *does* work, and who needs antivirus anyway? 😉

         
  4. MCL.Nicolas

    2012/11/17 at 04:19

    AntiVirus … Ohhhhhh dearrrrrrr ….

     
  5. nadzór archeologiczny

    2013/10/03 at 06:37

    whoah this blog is wonderful i love reading your posts. Keep up the great work!
    You recognize, lots of persons are hunting round for this info, you can help them
    greatly.

     
  6. Arv

    2014/07/19 at 13:26

    First laugh in getting in probably a few months .Great sense of humor i must say. im here because im trying to rebuild a version 5.0 uccx that crashed and then migrate that to 10.5 using the stepped upgrade. my engineers gave up so im giving it a go…..i cant find the OS CD…plus i went to boot up the 7825 and realized my engineer went home with the two sticks on 1g RAM…Why, have noo idea…

     
  7. Kritika Yadav

    2016/12/14 at 15:05

    This is a very useful information.Thanks Amy for sharing it 🙂

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: