Hey, voice gateway, that’s *my* call!

26 Mar

It’s not often that people ask me to keep calls from being answered by a voice gateway, but recently I got privilege of addressing just that issue.

The scenario here is not all that common, but if you should find yourself in similar jam, you are going to want to send me candy and flowers for this tip.

Say that you have a voice gateway and the only reason it’s there is so that some archaic fax machine can send and receive (die, fax, die!!), and so that outgoing user 911 calls are routed out the local PSTN.

Say that for whatever reason, an FXS card was not used for the fax machine, but instead, wiring wizards split off the PSTN connection at the demarc so currently both the router and the FAX machine share dial-tone from the same line.

Say that you determine not to question the setup so much as focus on making sure that when calls come in from the PSTN, the FAX machine takes the call and the router just sits there, pretending like nothing’s going on.

Here is the magical command you need to make this happen:

voice-port 0/0/3 (or whatever voice-port your PSTN connection is cabled to)
ring number 10

This sweet little command tells the router not to pick up when the call rings in initially.   This gives the FAX machine plenty of time to jump in there and take the call without the router interference.

Granted you won’t see this everyday. If you’re lucky you may never see it.  I, on the other hand, need to have a long talk with karma…

Be sure to check out this support forum, which led me to the above solution:

Published 03/26/2012

About these ads

Posted by on 2012/03/26 in Analog, FXO


Tags: , , ,

8 responses to “Hey, voice gateway, that’s *my* call!

  1. Paul

    2012/03/26 at 17:55

    im a big fan of “die, fax, die!” group! lol

    • amyengineer

      2012/03/28 at 10:01

      Hahaha! Me too! Seriously, 2012 and we are *still* faxing! Geesh!!

  2. Neelixx

    2012/03/26 at 23:10

    I love how you don’t question (but you really question) why the #%*! Someone would wire that up. I LOL’d

    So, I’m assuming thats a 10 second timeout while the fax auto-answers to see if it’s another hot fax girl? And if still idle, pickup the caller?

    • amyengineer

      2012/03/28 at 10:08

      Actually looked it up, the 10 is the number of rings to wait before answering to see if it’s a hot fax girl. ;)

      And yes, the real question is WHY??!!

  3. Jerry Hubbard

    2012/03/27 at 05:37

    One of several other places you may see this is with an alarm panel, one like you would have for a house alarm. This also is incorrect wiring. I should use have the analog line wired through the panel. That is the panel is wire first and in series with the router. The alarm may seize the line if it is in use. It’s not fool proof. It is good engineering pratice and risk management.

    • amyengineer

      2012/03/28 at 10:10

      I wouldn’t have thought of that, but yes, I can see this being a helpful command in that situation as well – if someone insist on wiring it that way! Thanks for bringing that up!

  4. Jerry Hubbard

    2012/03/27 at 05:45

    “I should use have the analog” should read “It should have the analog”

    Yes, I see some other minor mistakes. I bow to the word smiths of the world.

    Jerry you are sentenced to proof reading 101 detention for ten days.

    • amyengineer

      2012/03/28 at 10:11

      Heh! Now I make a really bad pun about cutting your *sentence* in half for good behavior. #cuerimshot


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 296 other followers

%d bloggers like this: